What... Me? Atheist?

I am an atheist. But I didn't always refer to myself this way. And even today, in order to do it, I have to define the word differently than the way most people use it. I define it as "not being a theist".

This entire post is my tear down of belief and non belief. Primarily I look at practice. Do I live my life as if there is an all-powerful super being whose words are transmitted through revelation to certain fallable humans during the Iron Age (or even before)?

There was a solid point in my life after I graduated from college and I was becoming my own man. I took a hard look at my own practices and I had to admit that I really didn't act like I believed in any God. I didn't go to church. I didn't pray.

And I had a special challenge, much as anyone does, to figure out what I was going to say about what I believe when family members ask why I'm not going to church or why I can't be someone's godparent in any kind of traditional sense because I would find it deeply unethical to raise a child in Catholicism.

Some might say that talking about it can be avoided. Because it's best to avoid talking about religion, money, and politics altogether... these are dangerous topics that will threaten any relationship.

But I think that core human values are enjoyable to contemplate and are worthy of discussion. I love ethics. Talking about ideas and values with other people helps me to feel a student of the world... and, to feel like a steward of my own life. Like I really own it and it is mine to craft according to my own vision.

And so, we begin where I started. I reverse-engineer the question of "what do I believe" by looking at what I do and inferring. I think there are four broad places a person can land and I define that in the next section.

Stages of Religious/Secular Practice

This scale of measurement asks two questions... - Does the person claim they believe in God? - Does the person act in accordance with religious or secular principles (or both)

By secular principles, I refer to any principle not derived from religion. Secular principles are defined here specifically to exclude any knowledge from religious sources that cannot be validated by reason. If some idea is merely transmitted by religion but can be validated by reason, I consider this to be secular.

Please observe also that there are many secular notions that are fallacious ideas that seem like they are reasonable but include an inappropriate switch of context or a comparison of unlike kind which leads to a contradiction. That a notion has arrived from a non-religious source does not make it automatically more likely to be true or valid. The measure of truth as always is whether a principle is in accord with observable fact, which can only be established by a process of reason.

  1. Believer with consistent practice of religious values
  2. Believer with a mixed practice of religious and secular values
  3. Non Believer with a mixed practice of religious and secular values
  4. Non Believer with consistent practice of secular values

The top half, I label as "Theist". The bottom half I label as "Non Theist". Interestingly, Athiest should mean the same thing as "Non Theist" but because of its usage in the USA, it carries some additional meaning when you factor for how vocal they are in categorically denying the existence of any possible supernatural being or revelation.

Misunderstanding the nature of a claim of existence, they claim the non-existence... which can never be proven as proof rests upon and is implied by existence, a fundamental precondition to go from the evidence of one's senses to a syllogism.

"So hey... there's this all-powerful superbeing in another realty that wants you to obey it according to some bloke named Muhammad... are you in or out?"

This is a claim of existence. And as with any such claim, it is not incumbent on the person evaluating it to disprove it. We don't have to furnish prove that Allah doesn't exist or that the text is wrong. The burden of proof falls on the person that makes a claim of existence. Either the evidence is strong enough to support the claim, ruling out other possibilities, or it is not.

Stages of Affinity/Antagonism toward Religion/Secularism/Knowing

This scale of measurement asks more than two questions... - Does the person believe in a religion? - ...further Does the person believe that knowledge of any kind is possible? - Does the person try to argue/persuade others about to challenge their beliefs or expound the reasons for the validity of their own?

This is an interesting way to measure things because people tend to equate the degree and depth of a person's belief with whether they would get on a soap box and scream it out to the world. I don't think this is true... but it is a perception that exists in the world.

It's also a useful taxonomy particularly to new Non Theists since there is generally a problem which I call "classic over-correction". People who have switched recently from half-hearted Theist to Non Theist often act out in unexpected and repellant ways. Often this is just temporary.

I can name three flavors of non believer when measured based on whether and how they argue with others. They are:
- Those who categorically deny the existence of a god - Those who reject claims of the existence of God (and revelation) based on insufficient grounds - Those who think knowledge of any kind is impossible

Most people label the first category as Atheist, but I label it as "Caricature Atheist"; the second, Rational Atheist, and the third has no clear label so I have labeled it "cynical skeptic". The Caricature Atheist and the Cynical Skeptic tend to be the loudest and most embarrassing of the Non Theists.

I present to you this spectrum involving more than two axes:

  1. (One True Faith) Believer and Vocal... Open judgment for anyone who believes other than own religion
  2. (Many Religions, All True somehow) Believer and Vocal... Judgment only for people who have no faith... Any religion is better than no religion
  3. Believer and Vocal
  4. Believer and Non Vocal
  5. Non Believer and Non Vocal
  6. Non Believer and Vocal about skepticism
  7. (Caricature Atheist) Non Believer and Vocal... Open judgment for anyone who doesn't deny any possible existence of any supernatural being
  8. (Cynical Skeptic) Non Believer and Vocal... Open judgment for anyone who claims they can know anything about anything

These really deserve a 3D space but as I am dealing with the written page, I'll have to sketch something up in the future.

Agnosticism

Looking at the three types of Non Believer I identified above. One might argue that there is a fourth which exists somewhere between the Rational Atheist and the Cynical Skeptic.

Measured by practice, the Agnostic is very similar to the Rational Atheist. However, an agnostic attempts to side-step the question of whether they accept or reject the claims of the existence of a God and the truth of revelation.

As such, the Agnostic straddles the position between Rational Atheist and Cynical Skeptic claiming that no one can know whether God exists or not. (Incidentally, this is also true about knowledge of anything non-existent... e.g. the existence of Ducks on Mars.). When confronted with a claim that must be evaluated consciously, the Agnostic chooses non-consciousness and non-acknowedgement.

The Agnostic turns out to be a mild sort of coward that prefers to remain in the closet than to take a position that others might judge.

It takes a measure of courage to recognize that your actions say that you don't believe in the claims of the existence of God. It takes a measure of courage to break ranks with your family and friends. In some societies, apostasy may mean ostracism or physical harm.

Even though we are in a country which has a separation of church and state, the vestiges of more than 10 centuries of terror remain in the psyche a people long after the threat of terror has ceased.

It is my position that the more courageous position is that of the Rational Atheist... who has consciously weighed the evidence and finds no grounds upon which to organize her life around the existence and words of an all powerful super-being. I don't think taking an Agnostic position helps a person to feel like an owner of their selves and their lives. I think it is a way of saying that other people are more important than your beliefs or the truth.

How much better to have some integrity about what you really believe and let the chips fall where they may?

For the Future

I've talked a lot about my ideas on how I identify different substrata of religious belief in reference to practice and in reference to vocal affinity/antagonism.

I haven't talked a lot about options for ethical systems but I think I might like to do that in a future post. People often try to substitute Society in the place of God and I think that is a mistake as well. (Just imagine trying to do so in Nazy Germany or the Europe of the middle ages). Destructive ideas can go into currency.

So there is a lot to talk about in a future post.

If you found this interesting or that there's something that you disagree with and you have ideas on how you would structure and identify things, drop me a line either in the comments below or reach out to me on Twitter @francisluong.

See you next time.

The End of the Face-battical

Back in September I expunged Facebook from my life. It was no longer serving me and, in fact, was a detriment to my life. I was using it habitually.

Please Facebook Responsibly

Please Facebook Responsibly

As a blind habit... using Facebook is dangerous. It is much too easy to use it vacuously as a reaction to be bored at any given moment. But I think that being bored from time to time is a hallmark of mental health, just as being hungry from time to time is a sign of physical health. I always feel a bit weird if I do not experience the pangs of hunger for a few days in a row.

As a communications medium Facebook is not good for everything. Most people scan very quickly and spend a long time replying only to the things that are most upsetting to them... for example, the misconstrued headline that causes a person to climb onto their soap-box and preach. No one wins in this situation.

I decided to re-engage yesterday primarily to join a Facebook group for WDS2016, a conference I am attending in August. Beyond a couple of groups, I intend to use it for purposes of:

  • getting bad news about good friends
  • sharing along articles and my own blog posts
  • posting updates

I will not use it for:

  • entertainment... The cure-all for every unoccupied moment
  • any reply that takes more than 30 seconds to write
  • any status update that takes more than 10 seconds to read
  • discussion of anything that requires nuance... Or anything that entails going more than 2 replies deep. I will use blog posts for things requiring lengthy explanations and face-to-face conversation for discussions of things that can be upsetting and require tone of voice.

Living Post: Notes on Aristotle's Categories

This post contains my notes on The Categories by Aristotle, the first book of The Organon. It will be updated as I make more notes.

Notes on Chapters 1-4

"A Subject"

Any individual instance... Socrates, Callias, Secretariat. This Macbook Pro.

"(present) in a subject"

Interpretation

Aristotle describes something (say, X) as being in a subject as which I am taking to mean "the subject has X as a characteristic". He doesn't mean a member of a collection.

Quote - from Chapter 2 (Ackrill)

(By 'in a subject' I mean what is in something, not as a part, and cannot exist separately from what it is in.) For example, the individual knowledge-of-grammar is in a subject, the soul, but is not said of any subject...

Examples

  • indidual knowledge-of-grammar is in a soul
  • white is in a subject, the body
  • all color is in a body

"said of a subject"

Interpretation

When Aristotle says that "X is said of Y", X is an abstraction of individual instances of Y. For instance, man is said of Callias and Socrates. Animal is said of man, cats, dogs, birds.

For something, X, to be said of somethings Y, it means that there is some kind of essential commonality that is being stressed and generalized by X.

Quote - from Chapter 2 (Ackrill)

...man is said of a subject, the individual man...

...knowledge ...is said of a subject, knowledge-of-grammar

Examples

(see above.)

Four combinations of "said of" and "in a subject"

These capture some relationship of things/concepts to one another.

---
    Said of a subject but NOT Present in a subject 
NOT Said of a subject but     Present in a subject 
    Said of a subject and     Present in a subject 
NOT Said of a subject and NOT Present in a subject

Standford refers to this as the four-fold division and says the following:

Aristotle's first system of classification is of beings, (τὰ ὄντα) (1a20). The division proceeds by way of two concepts: (1) said-of and (2) present-in. Any being, according to Aristotle, is either said-of another or is not said-of another. Likewise, any being is either present-in another or is not present-in another. (2)

...By focusing on Aristotle's illustrations, most scholars conclude that beings that are said-of others are universals, while those that are not said-of others are particulars. Beings that are present-in others are accidental, while those that are not present-in others are non-accidental. Now, non-accidental beings that are universals are most naturally described as essential, while non-accidental beings that are particulars are best described simply as non-accidental. If we put these possibilities together, we arrive at the following four-fold system of classification: (1) accidental universals; (2) essential universals; (3) accidental particulars; (4) non-accidental particulars, or what Aristotle calls primary substances. (2)

Said of, but NOT Present-in

What Stanford calls "Essential Universals" (2)

NOT Said of, but Present-in

What Stanford calls "Accidental Particulars" (2)

Said of, and Present-in

What Stanford calls "Accidental Universals" (2)

NOT Said of, and NOT Present-in

Individual beings. What Aristotle elsewhere calls "primary substances".

Resources

(1) http://www.amazon.com/Aristotles-Categories-Interpretatione-Aristotle/dp/0198720866/ref=sr11?ie=UTF8&qid=1455589514&sr=8-1&keywords=categories+ackrill

(2) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-categories/

Islamism and Donald Trump: How to Shine a Turd -- From The Email Files

The following is from an e-mail I wrote this morning to a long-time friend of mine who was lamenting about the way Muslims are covered by media.  I find my friend very easy to talk to and the words flowed very easily so I thought I'd capture what I said on my blog.

...
I imagine your level of frustration is very high with the media.  As is mine.  I barely consume any news these days.  I scan headlines though so I can tell you that David Bowie and Alan Rickman died this week.  But that's about it.  
My tendency these days is toward long-form content by people who are intellectually honest, like the Dan Carlin episode I tweeted at you.  Yes, these people have a much smaller audience than Fox News, but their impact is much deeper I think.
As for the response to Muslims in the media, I agree that the response is utter hyperbole.  
I have to view Donald Trump as a symptom of the problem more than a prime mover of it.  Ayn Rand, for all of the ways you can disagree with her, once said that Politics is the last branch of philosophy and politicians are the people who "cash in" on the ideas that are already present in a society.  They don't as much move the ideas.
What is the root cause?
I have recently arrived at a conviction that people are hungry for an honest conversation about Islamism.  I have come to view Islamism as fundamentally no different than Communism or Fascism, all of which carry out actions to impose a totalitarian (all-or-nothing) political system upon others.  Some people are willing to carry out actions which harm others, and some are merely reformers with strong beliefs, and some are people who just "vote their conscience".
But there is one non-fundamental respect in which Islamism differs from Communism and Fascism.  People are worried about being racist or anti-religion if they criticize it.  And people definitely get smeared for valid criticism.  The result is that the level of intellectual honesty out there is low and the level bullying is fucking unbelievable.  (see also: http://www.jeremy-duns.com/findingannfields/ which makes the case and presents evidence that the account @xtc_uk seems to be a smear account run by some douchebag named @MoAnsar).
So the well-meaning and intelligent people like you and me tend to be largely silent about it until something big happens in the news.
The intellectually honest conversations about what happens to individual rights under islamist policy are hard to find.  Instead there is a lot of hot air.  On the right you have the real bigots and xenophobes making noises that indicate a general disregard for anyone's rights.  And on the left, you have the reverse racism of low expectations, which, ironically supports conservative views provided that they are part of some "authentic" culture.  (A view I acquired from Maajid Nawaz's argumentation).  These people all resort to smears and bullying.
It is this vacuum which makes it possible for a tool like Donald Trump to say stupid racist shit and to come out of it seeming more honest and shiny than the rest of the yahoos on stage.  It's only by contrast that this effect occurs.  When measured on an absolute scale, he's utterly inflammatory and will have no regard for our institutions if elected President.
You may have noticed that I am somewhat vocal lately myself on Islamism.  I hope that I am not making an ass of myself.  But I am trying to make a practice of talking about hard things and sharing along the intellectually honest bits of conversation.
I think conversations of cultural change within a community are hard to have even without pressure from the outside because identity issues come into play and there's always the question of whether you are abandoning something fundamental.  Well... There are people that simply don't want any debate to happen and some of them are the bullies I referred to who do their best to smear and shout down anyone who criticizes and calls for change.
I'm acting on this premise:  What if we could influence that just a little?  If non-muslims in the west could stop their part of the smearing and shouting down... perhaps the debate could ensue among Muslims, and the loud and influential regressives in Islam could see their influence diminished.  And that might be enough for me to feel just a bit better about the direction that the world is heading.
I got on a bit of a tear there.  Hope you found it interesting.  
-Franco

How We Have Abdicated the Moral High Ground to the Extreme Right

One of the big takeaways I have from reading Islam and the Future of Tolerance by Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz is the pressing importance of finding ways to achieve honest dialogue. We need to be able to have respectful but direct discussions on the unique problems faced by, and presented, by Islam.

Gag Me Elmo by Mark Turnauckas

Gag Me Elmo by Mark Turnauckas

If we fail at achieving honest discussion and finding a coherent way forward, we risk that the people who sound like Donald Trump are the only ones who are saying what they are really thinking. This creates the impression that they have the moral high ground. But it is only by our own default that they have it.

It's not worth the effort to persuade the unabashed bigots on the right who are driven by their deep racism. We have to consider how we can help the well-meaning people, those who believe in the universal rights of a free democratic society (whom I will refer to hence as "universals").

We need help each other to see that we have been painted into a corner and that it's okay to walk on the paint because the building is on fire and we need to GTFO.

Some universals are Muslim, some are atheists like me. The goal as I see it, which this book has helped me to bring into focus, is to help the universal Muslims to battle for a pluralistic view of interpreting Islam and to defeat the cases for Jihadism and Islamism.

The part that people who are not Muslim can play is to understand that there are those among us who are making things difficult for the Muslims that want reform. Actions that we think are neutral may not be neutral. And there are some deeply dishonest people on the left who have done a good job of making us question ourselves by crying out "bigotry" and #Islamophobia against anyone who criticizes muslim societies or values. Nawaz refers to these as the "regressive left".

We universals have a hard time taking action that puts ourselves in the bigotry bucket because we care about the impact of our actions. They use this against us, but I think the time has come to grow a thicker skin. I now view political correctness as an auto-immune disease. This describes any time you choose not to say what you mean because someone will be offended or, more likely, label you a bigot of some sort.

The regressive left can go fuck themselves. The building is on fire. Let's get out there and discuss it.

Photo: Gag Me Elmo by Mark Turnauckas

Everything You're Not Supposed To Do After Paris is Attacked

So Paris was attacked on Friday. And all over social media people started telling each other what to do and what not to do. I collected a list of things that it is in appropriate to do so that the next time this happens, we can be prepared. Here goes nothing!

  • Don’t talk about “unimportant things”. I don’t want to hear about your toddlers… Paris just got bombed.
  • Don’t say things that I disagree with. “Unfriend me if you do.”
  • Don’t be silent. We must show the enemy we are not afraid and we will not accept threats. Paris needs to know that we pay lip service. Symbolic gestures (tell the enemy that they) are important.
  • Don’t let revenge motivate you. We must measured in our responses, or we let the enemy set the terms of engagement.
  • Don’t profile. I don’t care that a key mental mechanism of scientific advancement is noticing patterns. It’s only okay to profile if it conforms to notions of “political correctness”.
  • Don’t blame religion, we believe in freedom of religion! Especially not Islam or Christianity. (But atheism isn’t a religion… you can blame that all you want. You can’t have morality without a god to punish you in the afterworld.)
  • Don’t be “intolerant” of any ideas. Even if the ideas imply that it’s okay to murder you if you offend/blaspheme some notion of some god(s). Even if the ideas lead to the brutal oppression and mutilation women. Who are you to judge?
  • Don’t ever even suggest that Saudi Arabia is involved in exporting the ideas that animate coordinated mass murder. They are our “friends” and they sell us oil (it may seem like it’s for profit but they have our best interests in mind).
  • Don’t verbally mention Islamism or Islam. If we don’t talk about it, we can’t be called intolerant.
  • Don’t ever suggest war. War is not the answer.

It really does seem like when you add it all up, people really do want us to do nothing. That is, unless we happen to agree with them.

Using notions of what is “socially acceptable”, many voices emerge to pressure people and selectively work to constrain the conversation so that no one is saying anything too “upsetting”. Of course, the definition of what is “acceptable” and what is “upsetting” shifts depending on who you are. That’s how you end up with so many “Dont’s” that seem to contradict one another.

Sometimes the people doing the pressuring are you and me. We are playing the role of “thought police” any time we take it upon ourselves tell someone to pipe down and be politically correct or to act with decorum. We all have the potential to pressure others and shut other people down nowadays. The worst of us act to embarrass and humiliate and shame others until they submit.

In the aftermath of public mass murder, who does this serve and who does it harm? Does it help the victims to suppress speech? I can’t see how it would. One could argue in reason, however, that suppression of speech is completely in concert with the aim of the perpetrators of public mass murder.

How about we let the people who are still alive speak their words and trust them to revise their words and thinking as they go along? How about we let people react in their own ways? How about we let ourselves work through it?

The enemy wants us silenced. They want the ideas they don't like suppressed and they want the ideas that constrain us from acting in retaliation against them repeated loudly.

Let us defy them. Let us speak openly about the flaws of some of our ideas and begin to revise them. Let us name the enemy’s ideas: Islamism.

Fitness is a Priority Again (and Why I'm Mapping Out My Dreams)

I'm committed to my physical conditioning again. And it's a top priority now. I was previously doing a tiny bit of training each day. And though it was maintaining some of the muscle mass I have, my stamina just wasn't quite there.

Also, I had a chance meeting wtih a man named Jup Brown. I was just south of Big Sur on the California coast trying to give myself sticker shock at their little mini mart. And inside, I was standing next to a man considering the purchase of a coke. I didn't give him much notice, in fact I kind of thought he worked there.

Outside though, I couldn't help but be drawn to an outrageous bicycle with a trailer that had a bunch of toys on one mast and flags on another. Liz and I struck up a conversation with Jup and it turns out he's a real-life, flesh-and-blood, adventurer.

He started out from LA on 1/16/2015 and ran all the way to Boston by way of the southern US. Then a friend talked him into taking a bicycle ride all the way back. He decided to do it but first went to the eastern-most point of North America in Newfoundland and came back across Canada and down the Pacific Coast Highway.

I find myself feeling thoughtful in the aftermath of meeting someone who trusts life, and maps out really big things, and does them meeting and befriending tonnes of people in the process. I am still in a "definition" phase for myself, trying to decide what ambitious but short-range project would be meaningful to me. I know I want to have more personal work and more personal impact in my life. I don't know what form that will take but I now believe that if I start mapping it out, that I can make anything happen.

I'm starting with something familiar: committing to 90 days of P90X. This is to get myself again used to physical exertion, discomfort, and self-discipline. It seems so completely achievable after 2 months of life-after-Facebook and the inspiration of Jup's year-long adventure. But I intend to identify a dragon to slay, map out the path, and get to it.

Here's the question I am sitting with and I will leave it for you to ponder and answer for yourself. What in your life seems like the sort of thing your friends might talk you out of that you really think you ought to do? It doesn't have to be sensible, you don't have to know how to pay for it. You don't even necessarily have to understand what it's all about as long as your body seems to respond to it by gushing with possibility and energy.

Feel free to reach out to me and let me know. @francisluong

Ukulele Tab for Hey Jude in F

In the quest to learn Ukulele, one of my main resources is The Daily Ukulele by Jim Beloff. This book has a version of "Hey Jude" in it but it's transposed to C, which is the easiest key for playing but not the easiest for me to sing. So I decided to learn it in the same key that the Beatles recorded it, which I think is F.

Working from an existing guitar tab, I have mapped the chords to Ukulele and worked out what some of the slashed chords should be by ear. At some point I may record a video of how to play this tune, but in the meantime, here is my Ukulele Tab for Hey Jude in F.

Quick Hits: Initial Commit

I want to use this blog not only for long, thought out, posts but also for as a seed bin for things that I plan to put in dirt and water and to see if anything decides to sprout.

I will tag these sorts of posts as #quickhits.

Undeveloped ideas, quotes, and ponderables follow:

  • You can be a leader no matter what your job is. You need merely do any task better than you would expect it to be done. Going beyond the call of duty is a noble act of self-expression.
  • Goal-oriented competitiveness is boring and ugly. It requires that you take credit for luck when you win and to blame luck when you lose. How much sweeter it is to make your goal practice and improvement. This requires that you see luck for what it is and to take credit for those times you applied a skill well. Win or lose any particular match, you’re winning the bigger game.
  • Adopt this attitude: “assume not the ill intent of others”. This will help to remove the focus on blame, which is easy to do. It will lower your blood pressure. And it not give you less to justify any desire on your part to act-out in response. (This applies especially to friends and loved ones – there is always a reason for the things they do, even if it’s not pretty.)
  • “You must find the most important words a man can say” (Gavilar Kholin in The Way of Kings by Brandon Sanderson)
  • “Come with me if you want to live”. Imagine this being said, not by a super-human man/robot from the future but by a real someone leading an expedition to do great things.
  • As adults, we get to choose how to respond to upsetting events. We can choose how we act (or not to act). This is power. We can’t directly change how we feel but we can influence how we feel by working with the the levers we have: exercise, food, avoiding blaming narratives, not asking “why” when there is no way to answer it.
  • Scott Adams says I can use daily affirmations to focus my mind and my energy to make things happen in my life. But it’s hard to start new habits. I think my first affirmation will be an affirmation on the power of affirmations. That seems like a good idea. Either it will take root or affirmations don’t work after all.

Notes and Quotes from Tim Ferriss at QA Expa

  • Scratch your own itch
  • If I can guarantee that I will not lose money and then figure out that something works, only then do I plow money in after it.
  • If you can managed to cap your downside, you can afford to do many experiments and the upside will eventually take care of itself if you’re formulating good experiments
  • If you want to scale, build systems assuming you are 10x-100x the size, so that you are not the single point of failure (read: single point of decision making authority)
  • Keep this in mind: We don’t all die of old age. Lifestyle design is focused on present or near-term. VC-backed startup is usually deferred lifestyle
  • There should be no division between mind and body. If you want to perform well cognitively, you need to take care of the whole system.
  • You will not do well at something toward which you don’t choose to dedicate mental resources.

Re-Read: Elantris by Brandon Sanderson

I recently read Elantris by Brandon Sanderson for the first time.

And though it was my first time reading it, it was not my first encounter with the material. I had listened to Graphic Audio's movie-in-your-mind rendition of Elantris, complete with sound effects.

Audiobooks and Franco

I think that plain old Audiobooks are an amazing format that let you do things with your hands while you are giving direct attention to a story. The Graphic Audio version adds immersive background noises and music and different actors voicing characters, all of which help to set the scenes for you.

While this is great for entertainment purposes, I was amazed by how little I remembered when I sat down to read it after listening to it a year or two ago. I have also observed that my retention for nonfiction audiobooks is also lower. Maybe this is okay if you do just-in-time reading, which a lot of people seem to talk about these days. But I tend to do just-because-its-interesting reading. I don't necessarily have a purpose before I start reading something.

One thing I have done that works if I want to improve retention is to listen to an audiobook repeatedly. While I don't get the benefit of reading words more slowly during an intense section as I do with with words-on-the-page reading, repetition is a good way to make sure I keep more of what I read. Sometimes I will even just repeat a chapter a couple times.

I don't tend to do it as much for fiction because, as written works, they tend to run longer than non-fiction and I like to repeat the whole book in the order the author presented. I like to re-live the suspense of specific scenarios.

Reading to Wind [Down/Up]

I have been reading just before bed as a way to wind down. You figure that reading a fiction work, like Elantris, would help to put your active mind into standby-mode. And it's true for the first half of Elantris, which unravels slowly allowing you to really get comfy with Raoden, Galladon, Sarene, and Hrathen.

I love Sanderson's characters. I love to soak up my time with them. They are people I would find inspiring. They're larger than life and his heroes are somewhat idealized. This is what I expect out of good art. Time with interesting and inspiring people is awesome just before bed.

And it would be relaxing but for the second half, which shifts the story into light speed and deep suspense. All of the original threads collide. Big reveals shatter your notions about certain characters. Your sleep will be delayed by your nagging curiosity about what is going to happen next.

Elantris

Having finished my non-audio re-reading of Elantris, I find that I am in love with it. It was Sanderson's first book and I'm sure there are ways that it lacks the intricacy of his later works but I think it's a worthy read. I even recently bought a copy for a friend.

IOS 9: Text Selection On a Bluetooth Keyboard is Borked

I use my iPad with a keyboard a lot for writing but I think Apple has made a mistake with IOS 9.

I used to be able to shift-option-arrow to select words from a start point to wherever I place the cursor. But now when I press shift-option-left it expands the selection left and when I press shift-option-right it expands it to the right.

I can no longer reduce the selection using the keyboard. It only expands.

It should work just like on my Mac. Why change this?

This is a bad decision. It's affecting Evernote, Day One. But strangely is not affecting the Google search box in Safari.

I feel frustrated now when I try to edit text and I have downgraded to IOS 8 so that the device is usable for my main use case.

It shouldn't be like this. If you're frustrated by this as well or have an idea on how to revert the behavior, please add your voice to the Apple Support Forum discussion I created.

How Art Helps Us To Contemplate The World and Imagine

I've decided to explore in writing my thinking in response to having read Whose Fantasy? Whose Fantasy? by Wendell Bernard Britt Jr. I picked it up from this morning's digest from Medium.com.

My Summary of Whose Fantasy? Whose Fantasy?

  • In Hollywood films of the fantasy genre, black people have been relegated to subservient supporting roles in fantasy when they are portrayed at all.
  • The outrage by some whites over the casting of Rue from the Hunger Games as a black character (which is exactly how she is described in the book) indicates a larger cultural bias that sympathetic characters are expected to be white.
  • Fantasy is the timeless mythology of our age. It is a space that allows us to contemplate a concretization of the nature of good, evil, heroism, and what it means to be a person in society.
  • The fantasy genres, however, suffer a lack of imagination in the portrayal of black people. They are never the central heroes, only subservient side characters, and these portrayals only serve to impoverish black imaginations of what is possible for themselves.
  • In casting John Boyega as protagonist for Star Wars: The Force Awakens, JJ. Abrams and the casting team are portraying a black hero. This is a turning point to be celebrated.

Contemplation

Act 1: Art to Overcome A Stifling Reality

This is a brilliant piece of writing by the author, Britt. I find that I agree with the author on many points, especially on the important of mythology as food for contemplation and inspiration of what is possible.

Britt presents that what needs to be added to the culture of our age is black protagonists in speculative fiction. The totality of his ideas resonate for me strongly as true with some parts as questionable, and I intend to explore both.

Act 2: On Chickens and Eggs

Britt finds this to be true: Art has great power. So do I. And so does Ayn Rand. She shares this about the nature of art:

Man's profound need of art lies in the fact that his cognitive faculty is conceptual, i.e. that he acquires knowledge by means of abstractions, and needs the power to bring his widest metaphysical abstractions into his immediate perceptual awareness. Art fulfills this need: by means of a selective re-creation, it concretizes man's fundamental view of himself and of existence.

That’s a big mouthful to say that art lets us get “hands-on” with our values: What's important and what's not? What's good? What's evil? What’s the nature of existence?

What I want to explore is the claim that black people need to see black people in the role of the hero. On balance, this seems to hold true in a more universal sense: We relate best to characters that are similar to us.

But do the heroes need to be black to be relatable to blacks? I’m not sure.

Britt asserts that portrayals of black heroes in fantasy would help a great deal and the persistent portrayals of blacks in subservient roles does harm and lacks imagination. He states that fantasy writers and film makers are guilty of a lack of imagination in their portrayals of black people.

In a literal sense, he is right. However, it’s worth observing that a failure of imagination occurs on the part of the black person who is defined or constrained by portrayals of black people as subservient. Even if the portrayals are persistent, eventually one hopes that a bold outlier emerges from the trend and shatters it.

Britt claims that by changing the art, black people can imagine better. But he also holds that art imitates life. So what truly has to budge first? Life or art?

Seems like a chicken and egg scenario. And really it could be either.

Which means we have a stalemate and an opportunity. I can think of no better proof that race doesn't get to “have the final say” on our lives than to hear stories of successful black people overcoming the circumstances even with the stories and films as they are. These are the sorts of struggles that forge true heroes. In the bitter reality of life, the obstacle-laden path may be the only way.

Act 3: Awesome Asians

A question that has come up for me is, “to what extent do I rely on artistic portrayals of people who look as I do?”

I'm not sure that I am exempt from its importance. To examine this, I ask myself whether I can think of heroic characters who look as I do.

My parents are from Vietnam. I was born in the USA and because of this I am an American citizen with a very American perspective. Now, let's assume that my asian identification is a bit stronger than I believe it is. If I were to try to think up examples of vietnamese heroism the only person I can think of is the Buddhist Monk, Thich Nhat Hanh. One could do a lot worse than that.

But why stop there? Let's expand that to people from the many East Asian countries touched by China's influence. Now we're cooking with fire! Bruce Lee: Wisdom and Power. Martial artists and ninjas! The trusted and softspoken elder. Teenage boys piloting robots in anime!

My quick mental survey shows that I am not starved of artistic portrayals to which I can relate.

But what if I consider the question of whether I relate strongly to characters that do not look as I do. If I include Western art, I find that maybe the asian-ness of the heroes doesn’t much matter. I am able to relate to James Bond, and Harry Potter, and Austin Powers, even though I am not white and definitely not English.

This is what it means to me to be a man of the world. Though, perhaps I benefit from knowing where I come from even if I never go visit.

Act 4: Stolen From Africa… Brought to America

When the history of your people includes being packed into a boat and shipped to a different continent, as my family was, you can almost predict that it be difficult for that people to connect with the their own history in a meaningful and emotional way.

For black Americans, though, there are additional considerations. Slavery means a totalitarian obliteration of culture and disconnection with the past. It means the most outspoken and intelligent of your people being murdered. It entails a long term stifling of the spirit.

No matter how hard I try to empathize, there is no way for me to fully appreciate the experience of such a profound disconnection with the past. Britt's article reinforces for me that everyone needs art in a profound way, and I believe that black Americans especially need it because of this history. So when Britt suggests that people who make art, and especially film because of it's visual nature, have a unique opportunity to do good by creating heroic depictions where the protagonist is black, I can understand why it makes sense to call for it.

Britt observes that The Force Awakens does have a black protagonist and he applauds JJ Abrams and his staff. I applaud them as well. But that doesn’t mean I don’t want to pick some nits about Britt’s ideas on neutral characterization.

Act 5: … and The Importance of Race In Characterization

For speculative genres, race is a wholly unimportant aspect to characterization. This is to say that for characters like Frodo Baggins or Luke Skywalker, there is nothing that would prohibit them from being black.

I agree with Britt that the film makers (or authors) could just as easily choose to cast a black protagonist instead of a white one. (And between you and me, a black Luke Skywalker might be more believable as the son of James Earl Jones. Just sayin’)

But if race is "wholly unimportant" in the case of speculative fiction, if it is utterly neutral, it also means that film makers may lack a driving reason to cast black people rather than the whites they already know and with whom they have a long history of work. While it’s true that many artists are moved by reasons beyond profit, the film making industry is all about profit and is not fundamentally about "the imagination and production of a fair and equitable society". This is a challenge.

Moreover, some may not wish to risk audience backlash. For instance: I, myself, get annoyed when I think that a film maker has cast a black person in a role for the purposes of beating me over the head with “what a wonderful thing diversity is”. This is a gut reaction, I’m aware, to paternalistic political correctness, which I find stifling and oppressive. But I can cut myself some slack because someone else decided to make race an issue where it is not material to the story and, as such, violated my sense of aesthetics in a very distracting way.

I concede that white supremacy is really sneaky and it's hard to see it, especially in yourself. But I also don't care to have my art polluted with distracting cultural messages. Art should aim to be profoundly true first and foremost, cutting away anything that distracts or detracts from the story.

Act 6: Facts Should Inform Characterization

Along these lines, the best stories have deeply integrated characterization. By this I mean that all of the facts of a character contribute to who that person is and how he/she acts in the world. When we talk about race, it would be deeply flawed to expect that everything is the same except for skin color.

Race and culture are intertwined. And culture entails a certain way of doing things. This means that the story of a protagonist should be influenced by how he/she was raised and what his/her elders believed and what kinds of hurts they experienced along their journey. So long as there are cultural differences, white characterization and black characterization ought to be different in rich and interesting ways. This can lend the characters authentic voices.

Would I like to see more black heroes? Yes, if the stories are good. But I also don’t want to feel like I’m being spoon fed multiculturalism as an end in itself. I’d like to see some new stories which feature deeply integrated black characterization. That would be so much better than an accidental, last-minute substitution of a dark-skinned person into a culturally neutered role. I would hope that the cultural backdrop of the protagonist shines through to the his/her actions and decisions.

This is a sort of work that would have artistic integrity. Maybe it’s too soon for that, but that is what I would want to see.

Conclusion

I believe Britt has done an outstanding job with his writing. He has clearly identified a cycle of limited imagination and, in so doing, has made it much easier for people to avoid it completely. I truly deeply appreciate what I have thought about in the course of writing and editing this.

I still think it's important to get to a point where race doesn't matter. But I can also understand how much better life can be when you're inspired by art that feels personal.

Notes and Quotes from On Writing Well by William Zinsser, Chapter 11: "Nonfiction as Literature"

Franco Summary:  

For many people, "literary" means fiction.  But, this is an archaic and limited definition.  The twentieth century observed the rise of nonfiction as a respected form of literature in American culture.  Every writer should follow the path that makes sense and for many that will be non-fiction.  Do not let other people's "shoulds" convince you otherwise.

Selected Quotes:

  • "Those of us who are trying to write well about the world we live in, or to each students to write well about the world they live in are caught in a time warp."
  • "World War II sent seven million Americans overseas and opened their eyes to reality: to new places and issues and events.  After the war that trend was reinforced by the advent of television.  People who say reality every evening in thei living room lost patience with the slower rhythms and glancing allusions of the novelist.  Overnight, America became a fact-minded nation."
  • "Today there's no area of life–present or past–that isn't being made accessible to ordinary readers by mend and woment writing with high seriousness and grace."
  • "I have no patience with the snobbery that says nonfiction is only journalism by another name..."
  • "For most people learning to write, [the] path is non-fiction.  It enables them to write about what they know or can observe or can find out."
  • "If nonfiction is where you do your best writing, or your best teaching of writing, don't be buffaloed into the idea that it's an inferior species.  The only important distinction is between good writing and bad writing.  Good writing is good writing, whatever form it takes and whatever we call it."

It's Adorable! The Concert Ukulele Gig Bag by @PhitzCase

Liz is going to the beach today with some of her friends. A few weeks back, she joined me for a family trip to the beach and we brought our ukuleles. My Kala traveled in the rebranded Uke-Crazy case for Kala, which emphasizes protection but is bulky.

We didn't have a case for Liz's uke so we wrapped hers in a blanket and put a pillow case around that. Not a terrible way for a uke to travel for a car trip but I wouldn't want to take an instrument on a plane this way.

When we returned from that trip, I wanted to buy a uke case for Liz that we could easily stuff away during non-travel times. I purchased the concert uke case by Phitz on Amazon.

The Concert Ukulele PhitzCase and Copper (aka "The Buddy") 

The Concert Ukulele PhitzCase and Copper (aka "The Buddy") 

I wasn't expecting too much but the nylon feels good to the touch and makes the case feel premium. The padding is thick but not oppressive. You can still fold it and stuff it away. Frankly, it's adorable!

A minor drawback is that the storage is also "adorable" (read: cozy). If you try to stick songbooks into the pocket, it won't zip closed and they have to sit sideways. I would redesign the storage in version 2 to have a zipped inner pocket to larger open pocket which can hold a songbook or two.

I am impressed with the cost and quality of this case. If it holds up over time, that would round out what I already deem to be an excellent value.


(Conflict of interest note: None. I'm not receiving anything from Phitz to share this review but the Amazon links are affiliate links. You can support my writing by making purchases off of those links.)

(To The Buddy: thank you for enhancing my photo of the case.)

image.jpg

Candy Coated Philosophy: A Review of "Expelled From Paradise" (Anime)

WARNING: contains spoilers

Expelled From Paradise

Expelled From Paradise

I watched Expelled from Paradise on Netflix last night. It is set in a future where the Earth has suffered a calamity that is never depicted in detail. We know only that it has destroyed much of civilization.

Most of the population of Earth left their bodies behind to be uploaded into a virtual world on a space platform, which is where the film begins. It launches into action pretty quick when the virtual world is "hacked" and our absurdly-proportioned protagonist, Angela Balzac, responds to the threat but unsuccessfully. She is sent to Earth to hunt down the hacker and end the threat.

She is provided a body which is generated from a record (and possibly a stored sample) of her own genetic code and she shortens the development of the body so that she gets a head start on her fellow security officers. They are also her competition for achievement.

She lands on Earth and shortly rendezvous with her guide, a cowboy-bebop-esque paragon of Japanese masculine cool named Dingo. When he makes his appearance, he is in an all-terrain roadster, complete with roll cage, coming at her at maximum speed and he is being chased by a huge swarm of sandworms. Angela assists him to neutralize the threat. It turns out to be a calculated opportunistic play by Dingo to sell bulk sandworm meat to his customers who are not far behind. This is our introduction to Earth.

The earth of Expelled from Paradise is a light-heartedly malevolent might-makes-right post-poc world. On the heels of watching a few seasons of AMCs "The Living Dead", it feels like Dingo and Angela have it a bit too easy of a time for most of the film. I would expect a mean-hearted world to suffocate under the rule of an organized gang of thugs or a warlord or some such. I would expect the world to be much more lonely and the pockets of civilization to be less populated and civilized.

This anime avoids those archetypes completely and presents a world of autonomy with the vague threat of violence.

An interesting conversation takes place between our protagonists when Angela gets sick. Angela observes that Dingo has the opportunity to become a citizen of Deva and he lays out some of his reasons for why he'd rather take his chances on Earth with a meat body. He all but says that the governing council from Deva is a dictatorship and she begins to look at the world with new eyes.

This discussion will feel familiar if you've been around people who like economics and talking about pie. Deva has a very top-down model with a fixed-pie size where it's brute competition for who gets more of the pie (memory and compute resources). Indeed this is part of what drives Angela to want to best her fellow citizens and improve her station. The Earth, though desolate, seems to have an unknown pie size and what you get is governed by luck but ultimately seems less constrained than Deva. Dingo deems Earth more virtuous because it doesn't discard those deemed useless by "society". The movie flirts with exploring the nature of human rights.

We get a very personal demonstration of what rights a person has in Deva when Angela returns to report that the AI named "Frontier Setter" is not a threat. She is ordered to return and destroy it to "complete her mission". She refuses, acting on her moral principles, which directly challenge the desire of the council to control what they can and destroy what they cannot. They put her in a box. She is rescued shortly thereafter and the movie plods with over-the-top action toward denouement.

Overall, I enjoyed three main characters: Angela, Dingo, and Frontier Setter. They were all very attractive and were fun/intersting to get to know for a bit. And the setting was desolate enough to create interest without being overbearing. I love that the writer(s) examined fascinating questions about the future of human consciousness and what it means to be fundamentally free.

The movie falls a bit short of being serious though. There aren't huge points of moral conflict at the limit of where a principle runs out of gas and crashes into nuance. Instead we fly between different perspectives, moving from deeply flawed premises to obviously "good" ones. It makes this movie feel a bit candy-coated, especially when you add in the robot battles and gratuitous objectification of the female body.

But, the film is well balanced and does well as a summer action flick... hell, even the objectification managed not to be as overbearing as it could have been.

I gave it 4 Stars.

My Facebook is Deactivated

Effective this evening, my Facebook account is deactivated. Use SMS or other means to reach me.

-Francis

Quick and Dirty: Vanguard Voyager and Voyager Select

Lookout world. I can now buy Vanguard ETFs without paying brokerage commissions.

I've had this perk for a while since it only takes $50k in assets to qualify. But I guess I'm really bad at reading the fine print.

This could be a game changer for me (though it could also mean nothing depending on Vanguard's ETF offerings). Commission-free ETF trades make me feel better about my ability to improve my holdings which benefit from positive inflation.

Right now, I'm using REIT funds to represent that section of my portfolio, and they don't exactly fit the bill because their stock price correlation is too tight. I have some homework to do.